The HCF360 experience
Don’t just see the number. See what holds it up.
Explore the decisions behind a production day: where a quantity came from, how it was reconciled, what changed and who must approve it.
Interactive reference scenarios using synthetic data. These educational demonstrations illustrate the workflow; they are not customer results, a live product session or regulatory calculation software.
01 · The digital thread
A volume with a source, a method and a destination.
Move through the five stages. Inventory and allocation differences remain explicit, so traceability does not depend on pretending that every measurement point has the same quantity.
MTR-101 · sample record
10,000
observed bbl
Measure with the working shown.
Retain the original meter quantity, its unit, the measurement time and the source identifier. Observed and corrected quantities remain distinct.
Observed meter quantity = 10,000 bbl
- Source: synthetic meter MTR-101
- Period: reference production day
- Original unit: observed barrels
02 · Engineering judgment
Change an assumption. Inspect the consequence.
Compare proportional and uncertainty-weighted allocation, revise a tract split, or reject a test. Keep the reference baseline visible while exploring a separate scenario.
Branch a scenario
Higher uncertainty gives this estimate a larger share of the reconciliation adjustment in the simplified weighted model.
Tract 2 receives the remainder. This is a configured teaching split, not a recommendation for an ownership agreement.
A controlled comparison
The same total. Different evidence.
Pro-rata: 4,711.54 · approved sample baseline: 4,711.54
Pro-rata: 3,203.85 · approved sample baseline: 3,203.85
Pro-rata: 1,884.61 · approved sample baseline: 1,884.61
Well A’s pro-rata allocation split across two tracts
Simplified independent-error, uncertainty-weighted reconciliation. Correlation, physical constraints, multi-phase behavior and agreement-specific rules require a scoped engineering model.
03 · AI with an accountable reviewer
Confidence helps prioritize. Evidence authorizes release.
A proposed mapping is a draft. Walk through a source conflict and see the human approval gate before a sample configuration can be marked approved.
01 · Source evidence
A legacy tag, in context.
Tag: SEP_B_GAS
Workbook: Morning_Report.xlsx
Sheet: Test separator
Unit: Mscf/d
The drawing identifies SEP_B_GAS as the gas outlet of the test separator.
Synthetic workbook excerpt. The tag’s name alone does not establish whether this is a test or bulk separator.
02 · AI proposal
Surface the ambiguity.
Proposed class: bulk separator gas outlet. The workbook’s sheet title conflicts with the inferred class.
Illustrative confidence · 62%
Review required. A confidence score is a triage signal, not proof of accuracy.
The domain reviewer checks the tag against the source drawing and operator knowledge.
03 · Human release gate
Correct, then approve.
Release remains blocked until the source evidence has been reviewed. This demonstration cannot deploy a live configuration.
Reference evidence
Take the example apart.
Download the sample inputs, calculation rules and expected results. Use them to prepare questions for a scoped demonstration on your own facility.
Reference material, not an independent product certification. Customer benchmarks and production acceptance evidence must be established within each engagement.
Request a demonstration
See your operations connected across the value chain.
We will scope the demonstration to the facilities you operate and the way you close today.